Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Not For Review] [apache/helix] -- PreferenceList Ordering Changes during Maintenance Mode #2761

Conversation

himanshukandwal
Copy link
Contributor

@himanshukandwal himanshukandwal commented Feb 19, 2024

Issues

  • My PR addresses the following Helix issues and references them in the PR description:
    Demonstrates how preference list order changes during maintenance mode.

Description

  • Here are some details about my PR, including screenshots of any UI changes:
    When entering maintenance-mode, we observed that instance order in preference list changes by PreferenceListNodeComparator as it uses the order in which the current-state is materialized in array list.
    For instance:

Lets say we have 3 hosts, and here's the Current state:

{
   A: LEADER,
   B: FOLLOWER
   C: FOLLOWER
 }

Now when we create a preference-list using new ArrayList(currentState.keySet), the order in array-list depends on the hash order the keys (A, B, C). With sorting using PreferenceListNodeComparator, we put Leader at the front and ordering among Followers can be anything and could either be [A, B, C] or [A, C, B ]

Tests

  • The following tests are written for this issue:
  • Added TestMaintenanceRebalancer.testComputeIdealState

There 4 tests here:

Test Case 1,2,3,4: Shows how ordering changes from existing one.
current: [A, B, C] -> updated: [A, C, B]

  • The following is the result of the "mvn test" command on the appropriate module:

(If CI test fails due to known issue, please specify the issue and test PR locally. Then copy & paste the result of "mvn test" to here.)

Changes that Break Backward Compatibility (Optional)

  • My PR contains changes that break backward compatibility or previous assumptions for certain methods or API. They include:

(Consider including all behavior changes for public methods or API. Also include these changes in merge description so that other developers are aware of these changes. This allows them to make relevant code changes in feature branches accounting for the new method/API behavior.)

Documentation (Optional)

  • In case of new functionality, my PR adds documentation in the following wiki page:

(Link the GitHub wiki you added)

Commits

  • My commits all reference appropriate Apache Helix GitHub issues in their subject lines. In addition, my commits follow the guidelines from "How to write a good git commit message":
    1. Subject is separated from body by a blank line
    2. Subject is limited to 50 characters (not including Jira issue reference)
    3. Subject does not end with a period
    4. Subject uses the imperative mood ("add", not "adding")
    5. Body wraps at 72 characters
    6. Body explains "what" and "why", not "how"

Code Quality

  • My diff has been formatted using helix-style.xml
    (helix-style-intellij.xml if IntelliJ IDE is used)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant